Our Environment - Statement on Data Accuracy and Fitness for Purpose
Our Environment contains data that Manaaki Whenua has compiled from information derived from a variety of sources which have different data accuracy and hence differing fitness for purpose. These data may not be complete, correct or up to date. Manaaki Whenua advises that users should expect that ALL data contain error and uncertainty. You should therefore familiarise yourself with the information provided below to ensure you understand the limitations of the data presented on this website. Manaaki Whenua cannot be held responsible for inappropriate use of data and does not accept responsibility for any actions taken in reliance on the data or consequences arising from their use.
Land Resource Inventory (LRI)
This is a single spatial (polygon) layer with national coverage that contains several physical resource themes: land use capability, lithology, soil, etc. In terms of geographical data accuracy, the polygon boundaries were originally mapped at 1:63,360 scale, except where more recent mapping was carried out at 1:50,000 scale in Northland, Gisborne-East Coast, Wellington and Marlborough regions. This is regional scale mapping according to the Land Use Capability Survey Handbook (Edition 3). The minimum polygon size for the smallest area of interest in the LRI mapping was nominally 10 hectares, although some 2% of polygons fall below this threshold. Average polygon size for 1:63,360 scale mapping is 335 hectares, and for the more recent 1:50,000 scale mapping is 98 hectares, reflecting both increased mapping scale and improved standards of mapping.
The LRI is a regional-scale database and caution should be used when using these data at larger scales.
In addition to the geographical accuracy of the polygon boundaries, each resource theme is subject to uncertainties about the attributes (e.g. soil classification). Users should download and familiarise themselves with the relevant sections of the LRIS Spatial Data Layers Data Dictionary to ensure that the data are fit for their intended analysis. This is available for download from here in the LRIS Portal.
Interpretations in Our Environment based on the LRI and therefore subject to its data accuracy are: Erosion Severity, Surface Geology and all five of the land suitability classifications.
15m Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Manaaki Whenua produced its national DEM at 15m postings from 1:50,000 scale topographic data, including 20m contours, spot heights, lake shorelines and coastline data available from Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) using the TOPOGRID functions available in ArcGIS (ESRI). This DEM is exactly spatially aligned with the pixels in the pan-sharpened Landsat ETM+ multispectral imagery and has been optimised for slope accuracy to produce accurate standardized reflectance corrections to remove terrain shading effects from EcoSat data products. It is hydrologically consistent with the NIWA digital stream network and is useful for automatically producing catchment boundaries on flat areas.
Aspect and slope surfaces derived from the 15m DEM are currently based on standard ESRI ArcGIS algorithms calculated over a 3x3 cell neighbourhood. Note that the common practice of assigning elevation, slope and aspect values to specified locations by spatial intersection with DEMs or derivative layers should be treated with great caution. The preferred option should always be to use field measurement of site properties, if at all practicable. While these DEM–based surfaces provide greatly improved definition of surface properties, sensitivity of many environmental systems to topographic variation and the errors inherent in contour-derived DEMs make them better suited to implementing models rather than as a source of specific data values.
Interpretations in Our Environment based on the 15m DEM and therefore subject to its data accuracy are: Direction of Slope (aspect) and Steepness of Slope.
Land Cover Database (LCDB v4.1)
A New Zealand Land Cover Database has been preprepared three times from imagery collected in 1996, 2001, 2009, and 2012 as part of New Zealand's response to climate change and the Kyoto Protocol. The data used in Our Environment are taken from LCDB v4.1, published in July 2015, and are made available by Manaaki Whenua under a Creative Commons license. A number of metadata documents are available and those using the LCDB v4.1 should be familiar with this material. These include a User Guide and documents defining Target Classes that can be found on the LRIS portal.
Land Cover Database version 4.1 (LCDB v4.1) is a thematic classification of 33 land-cover and land-use classes covering mainland New Zealand, the near shore islands (re-mapping of Chatham Islands was included in version 4.1 - first mapped at version 2, but then not continued through versions 3.0, 3.3, and 4.0 because of resource constraints). LCDB v4.1 was released in July 2015 and used Landsat 7 ETM+ satellite imagery acquired over the summer of 2012/13. Like LCDB1, LCDB2 and LCDB v3.3, LCDB v4.1 adopted a one hectare (ha) minimum mapping unit (MMU) and to maintain compatibility between datasets for change analysis. Users should be aware of the following issues in using geospatial data derived from imagery with a 15m spatial resolution:
- Positional accuracy: In areas with good ground control the Landsat imagery is correct to within 1 pixel. In areas with poor control (typically mountainous terrain) the imagery may have a positional error of 2 or more pixels.
- Linework accuracy: LCDB2 had polygon polygon boundaries created using both automated and manual digitising techniques (at a display screen resolution of 1:15,000). Cartographically this resulted in a mixture of 'rasterised' and smooth polygons. The raster effect becomes noticeable at 1:25000. Given the spatial resolution, ortho-rectification error and scale of manual digitising of LCDB, procedures were introduced to automatically smooth polygon boundaries to create a consistent cartographic standard of representation. Good practice indicates use of LCDB at a scale of 1:25,000 or smaller scales (i.e. 1:50,000).
- Dominant cover rule: Users need to be aware of the dominant cover rule. For example, regenerating Indigenous Forest is classified as Class 69 (Indigenous Forest), providing more than 50% of the patch is characterised by emergent canopy species. A Shrubland polygon with three or more main species (where further subdivision of the patch based on the 1 ha MMU is not possible), is classified according to the dominant species in the matrix.
There was no official accuracy assessment of LCDB v4.1. For LCDB2 a Marlborough pilot study included an accuracy assessment, but this may or may not be applicable to the full dataset. A paper by Brockerhoff et al. (2008) in the New Zealand Journal of Ecology has useful information on class accuracy of LCDB2 (and LCDB1).
The interpretation in Our Environment based on the LCDB v4.1 and therefore subject to its data accuracy is: Vegetation.
Protected Natural Areas (PNA)
This is a parcel-based vector dataset with elements of cadastral land parcels included in the conservation estate, covenants of the Nature Heritage Fund, Nga Whenua Rahui, and QE II National Trust, along with Regional Parks of Auckland, Bay of Plenty, Manawatu, and Wellington. Data accuracy equates closely to standards for property and in many cases will have been subject to land survey with coordinate accuracy well below metre accuracy.
Threatened Indigenous Environments
The Threatened Environment Classification 2012 has been developed by Manaaki Whenua to help identify areas in which much reduced and poorly protected indigenous ecosystems are most likely to occur. It uses LENZ as a framework for representativeness of the abiotic environment. How much of the potential 'full range' remains in indigenous cover and how much is protected are calculated using the LCDB v4.0 and Protected Natural Areas of New Zealand (PNA-NZ) data layers. The Guide for Users of the Threatened Indigenous Environments classification provides the best available indication of methodology and data accuracy.
Potential Natural Vegetation
Potential natural vegetation (PNV) is a vector layer which provides an estimate of what New Zealand’s vegetation cover would have been in the absence of humans. It has been generated from largely raster data using statistical tools both for the interpolation of point climate data and the analysis of spatial patterns to reconstruct the likely biological character of New Zealand’s pre-human past. More information is available on the LENZ website or in Leathwick, J. R. (2001), 'New Zealand's potential forest pattern as predicted from current species-environment relationships', New Zealand Journal of Botany 39: 447-464. The accuracy of this dataset is difficult to assess since it portrays a concept rather than something that exists in the real-world. In addition, because it is generated from a number of input layers which include climate layers derived by interpolation, there is significant potential for complex propagation of errors. Finally, the original raster data layer has also been converted to vectors with some smoothing and simplification of linework. For this reason the PNV layer cannot be viewed at scales larger than 1:50,000 scale.
Basic Ecosystems (2002-2008)
This layer was derived from three existing data layers: the Land Cover Database 2 (LCDB2) (MfE 2002); the Land Use Map (LUM) from the Land Use Carbon Analysis System (MfE 2008; Dymond et al. 2012); and EcoSat Forests (Shepherd et al. 2002). Indigenous forest classes from EcoSat Forests were combined with classes from LCDB2 to form basic ecosystems classes. Where indigenous forest was mapped by LCDB2, the type of forest was determined from the EcoSat Forests layer. The eight forest types of EcoSat Forests were reduced to three basic types: beech forest; podocarp-broadleaved forest; and mixed beech and podocarp-broadleaved forest. To produce a recent 2008 layer the LUM was used to update indigenous and exotic forest changes since 2002. The mapping was performed using 15 m pixels, which is equivalent to a mapping scale of approximately 1:50 000.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions (2010-2016)
The current New Zealand greenhouse gas inventory derives implied emission factors that vary between animal types (Ministry for the Environment, 2010). The spatial distribution of animal numbers (dairy, sheep, beef, and deer) was modelled using a land-use map derived from AgriBase (AgriQuality New Zealand, July 2015) and the land cover database 2012 (LCDB4.1, Manaaki Whenua, 2015). The number of animals were scaled using statistics of livestock numbers at the regional level (Agricultural Production Survey (APS), Statistics New Zealand, 2016) and spatially distributed the animals using the potential carrying capacity from fundamental soil layers (Landcare Research, 2011a). N.B. Deer numbers were missing from the APS data for 2015-16 for the Taranaki region which results in reduced GHG values for the region. New Zealand-specific emissions factors were then applied using the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) methodology for the agriculture sector for methane and nitrous oxide emissions (Ministry for the Environment, 2010) as per method in Ausseil et al (2013).
Nitrate Leaching (2015)
Nitrogen leaching was estimated using OVERSEER farm nutrient budgeting software version 5.4 (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry et al., 2011) with a modifier to account for OVERSEER version 6. OVERSEER was run for the 100 combinations of soils and climate from level II of LENZ (Leathwick et al., 2003). Stocking rate were set to the carrying capacity of the land according to the New Zealand Land Resource Inventory (Landcare Research, 2011b), and annual leaching rate per stock unit calculated. The nitrogen leaching rates per stock unit were then combined with a map of modelled animal numbers to produce a map of nitrogen leaching for all of New Zealand. The spatial distribution of animal numbers (dairy, sheep, beef, and deer) was modelled using a land-use map derived from AgriBase (AgriQuality New Zealand, July 2015) and the land cover database 2012 (LCDB4.1, Manaaki Whenua, 2015). The number of animals were scaled using statistics of livestock numbers at the regional level (Agricultural Production Survey (APS), Statistics New Zealand, 2016) and spatially distributed the animals using the potential carrying capacity from fundamental soil layers (Landcare Research, 2011a). N.B. Deer numbers were missing from the APS data for 2015-16 for the Taranaki region which results in reduced GHG values for the region.
Sediment Lost (2012)
This layer depicts estimated sediment/soil loss across New Zealand and was created using the NZeem erosion model. Erosion control is defined as the prevention of soil loss by an ecosystem. NZeem has been calibrated from sediment discharges measured in New Zealand rivers (Dymond et al., 2010). This model estimates the long-term mean erosion rate from all sources of erosion, both mass-movement and surficial, and accounts for all sizes of rainfall events. The model was run on the national datasets of rainfall, erosion terrains, and LCDB4.1 (Manaaki Whenua, 2015) to produce a national 1:50,000 scale map of long-term mean erosion rates. Dymond et al. (2010) assessed the accuracy of the model by comparing predictions of specific sediment discharge (assuming sediment delivery ratio of 1 everywhere) with available measurements and obtained a model efficiency of 0.64.
Sediment Retained (2012)
This layer depicts estimated sediment/soil retention across New Zealand and was created using the NZeem erosion model. Sediment retained is defined as the difference between soil loss with and without tree cover (sediment loss avoided). Erosion control is defined as the prevention of soil loss by an ecosystem. NZeem has been calibrated from sediment discharges measured in New Zealand rivers (Dymond et al., 2010). This model estimates the long-term mean erosion rate from all sources of erosion, both mass-movement and surficial, and accounts for all sizes of rainfall events. The model was run on the national datasets of rainfall, erosion terrains, and LCDB4.1 (Manaaki Whenua, 2015) to produce a national 1:50,000 scale map of long-term mean erosion rates. Dymond et al. (2010) assessed the accuracy of the model by comparing predictions of specific sediment discharge (assuming sediment delivery ratio of 1 everywhere) with available measurements and obtained a model efficiency of 0.64.
Water Yield (2012)
This layer represents the net supply of water remaining after evapo-transpiration losses (mm/yr) as an indicator of water-flow regulation. We ran the model WATYIELD (Fahey et al., 2010) for all the different combinations of soil types and climate in New Zealand and stored the results in a lookup table so that a simple computer workflow involving national spatial data layers could be implemented. Water yield (i.e. quickflow and baseflow drainage) (mm) is a result of the mean annual rainfall (mm) times the proportion of rainfall that becomes water yield. This proportion is a function of land cover (forest, scrub, tussock, and pasture), soil type, and climate (Dymond et al, 2012). Input data to this model are the land cover 2012 LCDB4.1 (Manaaki Whenua, 2015), the mean annual rainfall and a lookup table for soil-climate combinations based on level II of LENZ (Leathwick et al., 2003). Although this is a simplified view and does not consider low flows or flood flows, it permits national assessment with the use of a nationally applicable water-balance model.
This wetlands dataset has its origins in the Wetlands of National Importance (WONI) project, which was part of the Sustainable Development Programme of Actions for Freshwaters which had the goal of identifying a list of water bodies that would protect a full range of freshwater biodiversity. The pre-human extent of wetlands was produced using soil information from the New Zealand Land Resource Inventory (NZLRI) and a 15m digital elevation model (DEM) to refine soil boundaries. Current wetlands were defined by combining existing databases including LCDB2 (Land Cover Database version 2), NZMS 260 Topomaps, existing surveys from Regional Councils, Queen Elizabeth II (QEII) covenant wetland polygons, DOC surveys (WERI database), and the 15m DEM, to define a single set of wetland polygons and centre points. All this data was checked against a standardised set of Landsat imagery using the Ecosat technology and where necessary new wetland boundaries delineated. Wetlands were classified into 7 groups at the hydro-class level using fuzzy expert rules.
Last updated: 22 May 2018